NO. 96-2-10174-5 SEA

SPECIAL VERDICT FORM

 
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
 
DAVID E. SVENDSEN,
Plaintiff,

      v.

CONNIE EDWARDS AND JOHN L. SCOTT, INC,
Defendants
_____________________________

We, the jury, make the following answers to the questions submitted by the court:


QUESTION NO. 1: Was there any error, innacuracy, or omission in the Form 17 submitted by the Stocks?
ANSWER: YES

      If you answer Question No. 1 "no", then skip to Question No. 2, and answer Question No. 3.

QUESTION NO. 2: Did John L. Scott have actual knowledge of the error, innacuracy, or omission in the Form 17 at the time of sale?
ANSWER: YES

QUESTION NO. 3: Did John L. Scott commit fraudulent concealment?
ANSWER: YES

QUESTION NO. 4: Did John L. Scott commit negligent misrepresentation?
ANSWER: NO

QUESTION NO. 5: Did John L. Scott violate the Consumer Protection Act?
ANSWER: YES

      If you answer Question Nos. 2, 3, 4, and 5 "no", then skip Question Nos. 6 through 9 and sign the verdict. If you answer Question Nos. 2, 3, 4, or 5 "yes", then answer Question No. 6.

QUESTION NO. 6: Were any of the following at fault?
ANSWER: YES NO
David Svendsen: X
John L. Scott or Connie Edwards: X
Greg or Randi Stock: X
Greenwood point Homeowners Ass’n: X
David Irvine: X
Vicki Estes: X
 
      If you answer Question No. 6 "yes" as to John L. Scott, then answer Question No. 7. If you answered Question No. 6 "no" as to John L. Scott, then skip Question Nos. 7 and 8

QUESTION NO. 7: Was such fault a proximate cause of damage to Mr. Svendsen?

      Answer "yes" or "no" after the name of each entity, if any, found at fault by you in Question No. 6.

ANSWER:
David Svendsen: NO
John L. Scott or Connie Edwards: YES
Greg or Randy Stock: YES
Greenwood Point Homeowners Ass’n: NO
Vicki Estes: NO

      If you answer Question No. 7 "no" as to John L.Scott, then skip Question No. 8. If you answer Question No. 7 "yes" as to John L. Scott, then answer Question No. 8.

QUESTION NO. 8: Assume that 100% represents the total combined fault which proximately caused Mr. Svendsen’s damage. What percentage of this 100% is attributable to the fault of John L. Scott, and what percentage of this 100% is attributable to each entity, if any, whose fault was found by you in Question No. 7 to have been a proximate cause of the damage to the plaintiff? (Your total must equal 100%.)
ANSWER:
David Svendsen: 0
John L. Scott: 95
Greg or Randi Stock: 5
Greenwood point Homeowners Ass’n: 0
David Irvine: 0
Vicki Estes: 0

 
      If you answer Question Nos. 2, 3, 4, 5 or 6 "yes" as to John L. Scott, then answer Question No. 9. If you answer Question Nos. 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 "no" as to John L. Scott, then skip Question No. 9 and sign the verdict.

QUESTION NO. 9: What do you find to be the amount of MrSvendsen’s damages?

ANSWER: $38,298.00


      Sign and return this verdict.

      Dated this 23rd day of September, 1997

Foreman